9. FAMILY LIES AND CRIMES: EMAIL PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE (2009)

9. FAMILY LIES AND CRIMES: EMAIL PERVERTING THE COURSE OF JUSTICE (2009)

Attached is another co-authored, also law-breaking email from family to me, this one dating from March 2009. Like the February 2007 email jointly written by the parents (attached to post 7 below), this email also commits serious crimes punishable by lengthy prison terms.

But the email wasn't co-written by the same pair. This time one of the authors was / is the criminal cop. And again, the email account being used for the criminality was his mother's. She adds her own words at the end of this extraordinarily self-incriminating email.

The email in fact commits two crimes: (1) perverting the course of justice through (2) witness intimidation. The first is a common law offence that carries a maximum sentence of 15 years, the second an offence under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act (1994), punishable by up to five years.

Both crimes would be considered by a judge to be exceptionally serious and aggravated offending - one of the suspects was a serving police officer on the date of the email, and he himself was the subject of the police investigation that he and his mother were seeking to corrupt with this dishonest / fraudulent email warning me to back off - even openly to "Stop this now": i.e., stop reporting their crimes.

Bear in mind that a heck of a lot was at stake here for them after I reported him to the IPCC: loss of his job and police pension, even loss of his and his family's liberty, and of course collective loss of their reputations in the eyes of wider family (not to mention everyone else who knows them).

He was my brother, you say? No, he wasn't. He hadn't been any sort of brother to me since the moment he assaulted me very violently from behind 29 years before, when I was 16 and he was 19 and about 40lbs heavier - and a police officer breaking the law back then too.

And nor has she been maternal to me, except in behaviour designed to maintain my trust while harbouring every intention of abusing that trust - the trust of her own son - in grossly repellent, horrific betrayals time after time from 1975 to today.

_____________

To give the reader some necessary context, at the time I received the attached email, I was determinedly pursuing a complaint about illegal invasion and disclosure of my private, protected data by the said police officer in criminal collaboration with his parents AND his youngest brother.

All four members of family were at the meeting (to which of course I wasn't invited - I watched three of them troop out of the house without a word about where they were going) when and where this idiotic, criminal enterprise was hatched in 2008, so all four therefore were in on the criminal conspiracy to invade my privacy, which is what started all the troubles that dominated my life during 2008-09.

By this time, I had been enduring for over three decades constant invasions of my privacy and so much other malicious interference by family. Once I'd seen that their behaviour had crossed the line into criminal invasion and disclosure, I wasn't in any mood to hold back. I'd had plenty more than enough of their troubling and unstomachable, creepy and deeply damaging behaviour long before this latest vile situation came about in my life.

First, in autumn 2008 I reported the criminal privacy-invasion to police, who directed me to the then-IPCC (now the IOPC), who to my horror sent the matter straight back to his police force to look into. As you'll see in future posts on GoFundMe backed by evidence here on Facebook, the police then did everything in their power to deliberately foil / foul / squash their own 'investigation' into one of their colleagues, so that the criminal cop brother and his family would (and did) get off the hook - and I would be (and was) denied my rights to protection under the law and to justice.

I could see what police were doing and I took them to task over it - insistently emailing them from Paris to ask for updates - and reinforcing my complaints with new, ever-more incriminating information about family as I was working out by well-reasoned, clearly conclusive deduction more and more of what had gone on here - inlcuding that several crimes had been committed, not one.

In particular, I spotlit / highlighted for the investigator (in writing) the provable fact that the criminal copper had accepted a huge bribe from his parents to go into a file about me held by police, and to report back to it. He HAD.

In 2008 I had learned by deduction - after hearing the old man ranting about his eldest son - that in return for illegally accessing a file from an investigation he had no part of, and then reporting its contents to his parents, their criminal-cop son had asked them to defer indefinitely repayment of the £50,000 they had loaned to him in 2001 when he'd had to buy out his second Wife's share of their house because She was divorcing him after six months of very serious spousal abuse. That was his price, I know for an absolute certainty (and for a number of reasons not given here).

Police did NOTHING about my report of this easily provable, very serious criminality either - they simply ignored it. They hardly ever asked me a single incisive question about any of my allegations; they never do - even now, when I tell them I have found even MORE evidence of their crimes. Often as not, the defective detectives of his former force ask me no questions at all; yet they call what they are doing "investigation".

Nor did they do anything when I informed them by emails in 2009 that I was becoming confused by being led to believe by family that the investigation and disciplinary hearing had been held and completed (see the email from family attached) while police were continuing to tell me that no hearing had been held (see posts 10 and 11 above).

My emails to and a single phone conversation with the 'investigating' officer (the only time he called me) made it clear to police that a lot more crime was going on than invasion of data privacy - a LOT more, as we can see in this extraordinarily incriminating email of 27 February 2009.

____________

We first see and almost at a glance that the email has two authors. The first nine short paragraphs are identifiably the criminal cop's semi-literate handiwork, while the closing two are recognisably his criminal mother's.

In his contribution to the email, he:

1. lies when telling me, the sole witness in the case against him, that he has already been subjected to a disciplinary hearing on 19 March (two emails and a letter to me from police sent to me MONTHS later make it clear that no disciplinary hearing for him took place on 19 March);

2. almost certainly lies again when writing that the police "ICT Department have been monitoring your [i.e., my] mail and have deemed it threatening and abusive. They have therefore put a block on it and all your mail is deleted before reaching [him]."

I quote now from the footer of the one and only email sent to me by the criminal cop from his police email address: "[His police force] reserves the right to monitor all email communications through their networks."

In other words, he knew that email to and from his police account could be read by others in his police force and attract even more unwelcome attention to him.

Since I was bombarding both him and the investigating officer at that time with emails making multiple accusations of wrongdoing, some of it very seriously criminal indeed, the much more likely explanation is that he wanted me to stop emailing because other, more honest / less dishonest / less criminal police staff might read them and bring their contents to the attention of higher-ranking police who might actually act on my legitimate, provable allegations / reports / complaints of his and his family's criminality.

3. lies again and seeks to intimidate / threaten me when writing that he "has declined top [sic] make a complaint ... but his Senior Management are increasingly concerned about your abuse of the Police Computer and Telephone System and may act without [his] consent" and by calling my emails to him and to the investigator "electronic long distance harassment".

It is highly unlikely that senior police were aware of my emails, which were neither "harassment" nor criminal in any other way.

4. lies again and repeats the menacing by writing, "If you wish to contie [sic] the abuse, you may, as it enhances the police investigation against [sic] you."

Moments before, he had just written that there was NO investigation into me (and why would there be? As he knew and I knew, I had not committed any crime).

5. last, appears to make a thinly veiled threat to me - the sole witness complaining about him - by writing, "[he] looks forward to meeting you face to face".

Good one. How very funny. Family have NEVER come at me head-on / face-to-face - it was always at long distance and behind my back.

In short, he lies four times and makes two threats to the one witness reporting him for criminal conduct.

Note also the very important point that he has sought to disguise his authorship of all of the foregoing by sending these words via his mother's email account, not his own personal one or his police one. In other words, he KNEW that all of this from him was yet more criminal behaviour.

Note too the timing of the email. Hotmail clocks it at 10.45pm on 29 March 2009 (a Sunday). They were in England, I in France - one hour ahead. We should also take into account that for some reason, Hotmail adds an hour to my computer clock time - I don't know why, but it does (and naturally I can prove that too).

That means that the email was sent at 8.45pm on a Sunday evening. At that time, he was most definitely drunk. I base that unequivocal conclusion on his routine behaviour, observed by me on many Sundays for many years.

Every other Sunday, he would come to his parents' house with his two sons for the family lunch. And every time, he and his father (and if I was there, I too) followed the same, drunken routine on a Sunday: at 1pm, we'd be at our local pub and would sink at least three and often four pints of beer (he of lager and his father of Guinness) before sitting down to lunch at 2.15-2.30pm, at which there would be two bottles of red wine. Of that wine, he and his father would sink the most by far.

The criminal cop would then drink-drive his sons nine miles back to their mother's at 4 or 5pm, after which he would then continue drinking throughout the evening in his home village. I saw him repeat this pattern of behaviour twice a month on Sundays for VERY many years.

But on the evening of 29 March 2009, he was evidently not back in his village - that night, he was typing this email with his mother miles away at the family home.

On the day of the email, he had drunk by that time that evening the equivalent of around a gallon of beer (at very least). Given also (1) the stresses that he was under after being caught in his ill-conceived criminal acts and reported for them, and (2) his known record by that time as a serially criminal domestic abuser and liar, I believe I have explained or accounted for the sheer, criminal stupidity that is evident in the writing of this email by him that night - i.e., why he would do such a risky and stunningly thick-headed, even more criminal thing.

____________

As for his mother, she too is evidently criminally culpable here.

In her two paragraphs closing the email, she too commits crime by:

1. merely raising in an email obviously intended to deter me from pursuing a legitimate complaint of crime the subject of money bequeathed with instructions to "provide for [me] equally", but which is money that she holds and controls;

2. using much emotional blackmail, first in blaming the investigation instigated by my perfectly understandable and legitimate complaint for causing or contributing to her husband's stroke, when it was his and her idea to bribe their police son to commit crimes in the first place;

3. again using emotional blackmail by blaming my report to police of family crimes (including hers) for her own deteriorating physical health. All three of them brought this on themselves;

4. using more emotional blackmail by writing that I am "making life very hard for" her and suggesting that she thinks I do not care about my own mother;

5. last, by overtly instructing me to "Stop this now." Here, "this" can only refer to my reporting their crimes to police.

Now, she unlike her eldest son would not have been drunk at that time of writing. At Sunday lunches, she would have no more than a single glass of wine. Notwithstanding her sobriety, she collaborated here in a criminal act or rather acts by her police officer son, acts part of a series of crimes initiated by her and her husband in a meeting between the parents and their two criminal sons.

____________

I like to end a piece of writing on a lighter note whenever I can, especially when the levity comes in the form of black comedy.

Here with this post, we very much can.

The criminal, serial domestic abuser cop, who has been menacing my life for 29 years by the time he wrote his share of this email, accuses ME of being "threatening and abusive".

But the richest, blackest irony of all here is this: his mother - who can only have ever hated me since my childhood to have willingly and deceitfully taken part in the life-shattering abuse of me that she has all along been very much a prominent participant in - writes: "You are making life very hard for me. Perhaps you don't care."

😂 😂 😂